Is the contractor legally responsible for lost value of the property when he demolished 1 of 2 units without realizing the zoning had changed to 1?

2 unit land had a zoning change to 1 back in 1995. Contractor hired to remodel the older house of the lot had taken down too much for a remodel, city prohibited a rebuild of the house because of zoning change. contruction can only be an extension of the existing unit. is the contractor legally responsible for lost of value?

Asked on May 26, 2009 under Real Estate Law, California


MD, Member, California Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 11 years ago | Contributor

Quite possibly.  It depends on if you can quantify your damages.  In other words, you had a current tenant, and lost it due to contractor's negligence.  It may be based on the common law principles of negligence

To contact a land use attorney, try and then check his or her record at under attorney search.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.