How does California unlawful harassment law differ from federal law?
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Jun 19, 2018
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
California unlawful harassment law is more expansive and stringent as compared to federal law. In addition to the usual protected classes of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, age and disability, the Golden State adds marital status, pregnancy, genetic characteristic, medical condition and sexual orientation.
California employers are “strictly liable” (i.e. there is no defense) for unlawful harassment by their supervisors. While there is an “affirmative defense” under federal law to supervisor “hostile work environment” where no “tangible employment action is taken” against the alleged victim, that won’t apply under California law.
Supervisor harassment: If you’re an employer and worried abouot liability, the best case under California if a supervisor is the alleged wrongdoer, is the company will be liable, but the amount of damages (money) it must pay can be reduced. The employer must show (1) it took reasonable steps to prevent and correct workplace sexual harassment; (2) the employee unreasonably failed to use the preventive and corrective measures that the employer provided; and (3) reasonable use of the employer’s procedures would have prevented at least some of the harm that the employee suffered. This does not eliminate liability, but it can reduce the amount of money your business has to pay.
Nonsupervisory harassment: For unlawful harassment by non-supervisors, a California employer is liable for such “co-worker” harassment only if (1) its management knew or should have known of the harassing conduct and (2) failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action. Therefore, if your mangers/supervisors learn of an unlawful harassment complaint, immediate action, including immediate commencement of an investigation and taking prompt corrective action as necessary, would be prudent.
50 or more workers: California companies with 50 or more employees are required under California law to train all “supervisory employees” for at least two hours every two years in unlawful harassment and discrimination. The training must be in the classroom or “other effective interactive training” and be presented by qualified trainers with knowledge and expertise in the prevention of harassment, discrimination and retaliation. See http://www.fehc.ca.gov/act/SEXUAL_HARASSMENT_training.ppt for the Fair Employment and Housing Commission’s guidelines on training. Federal law imposes no such requirement.
Summary: To summarize, California imposes the following duties on employers:
- Duty to Take Reasonable Steps to Prevent Unlawful Harassment
- Duty to Promptly Investigate Claims of Unlawful Harassment
- Duty to Take Immediate and Appropriate Corrective Action
- Duty to Train on Unlawful Harassment, Discrimination and Retaliation (50 or more employees only)