Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Nov 8, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

You’ve seen the small print on the back of a sales receipt with the list of rules for refunds. In fact, many of these small print contracts will actually state that by purchasing that item, you are agreeing to the store’s terms of sale. Many courts have been allowing these so called “contracts of adhesion” or “take it or leave it” to be binding.

Typically, courts will uphold provisions such as terms of sale, arbitration clauses, and terms of refund or cancellation of sale. These provisions are considered reasonable and more instructional in nature than actually binding. For instance, sales receipts may state that the store will not return an item without a receipt. This is a retailer’s right and something that they did not even have to tell you. Instead, they chose to place it on the back of the receipt, in small print, to encourage you to keep your receipt in case the purchase is defective.

The court will consider whether the small print was manifestly unfair or unreasonable when determining whether it was valid. For instance, if a car dealer places small print in a contract stating that you waive your right for a claim under the Lemon Laws, this would be considered manifestly unfair, as it is removing a protection placed in the law for consumers. In addition, contracts that violate a law or that are against public policy are also considered invalid. For example, if your optometrist’s contract states some added charges that will be sent to your insurance company that are not valid, this is a violation of law known as insurance fraud, and it will not be considered valid. As a general rule, if a contract contains any fishy provisions, whether in small print or regular print, it is best to consult with an attorney to avoid future problems with that vendor.