What can I do if my car wasdamaged by a gate and both the HOA and insurance company refuse to pay?

My car was damaged by the automatic gate in my gated community. The HOA and insurance company refused to pay claiming that they “did not know the gate was defective and they fixed it after my car was damaged”. If I sue, is there strict liability here or do I have to prove negligence. They claimed the gate video camera was not working.

Asked on March 22, 2011 under Accident Law, Nevada

Answers:

SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 9 years ago | Contributor

Unfortunately, the HOA would not be liable under a strict liability theory, so you'd have to prove negligence to establish their liability for the damage to your car. (Their insurer's obligation to pay is based on the HOA's obligation to pay.) However, it might be possible to do so--it's not enough that thye themselves did not know the gate was no working--though if you can find any other person who complained to them, that could establish actual knowledge. It may be enough if they reasonably should have know--such as someone reported some other damage to or problem with it (i.e not the specific problem that damaged your car, but something else that suggests the gate was not working right) that would make a reasonable person investigate, or if the company installing or maintaining it reported issues that should have been resolved. Negligence could also come from improper maintenance; there thus may be some ways that you can establish negligence.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.