Can an employer advertise a job position with stated pay and benefits and then when they hire the employee not give the advertised benefits?

My employer advertised a job position with a set pay and benefits package. It took

approximately six months to be vetted through the hiring process to be offered the job

position. My employer hired 26 employees total during this job vacancy announcement. We all had already quit our previous employment to come work for our new employer. When we accepted the position and were hired we were then told the benefits they advertised had changed and we were not eligible. Is there any way to sue the employer for misguiding us on the benefits package we were going to receive?

Asked on September 27, 2016 under Employment Labor Law, Kentucky


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 4 years ago | Contributor

Generally, if there was no actual written employment contract guarantying the benefits (or a given salary/wage, for that matter), an employer may change them at will, including right before or as an employee starts. This is a consequence of all employment being "employment at will" in this country when there is no written contract.
You can *try* suing based on the theory of "promissory estoppel", which *sometimes* will hold a non-contractual promise, such as in the advertising for a job, enforceable, but be warned: it is a very upill battle and not likely to be succeed (it gives you a chance, but that's all). The idea is that if someone makes you a promise (like of benefits or a certain wage) to do something (like take a job) and does so knowing that you would have to do something significant to your detriment (like quitting an existing job), then their promise, made intentionally with knowledge of the detriment to you, may be enforceable. But some hurdles you will face are:
1) You'd have to show that they actually *knew* you'd be leaving a prior job just to take this job; 
2) You'd have to show that your reliance on their promise was reasonable--and in an employment context, given "employment at will", it's tough to convince a court that it is reasonable to rely on any promise not put in writing specifically to you (at the least an offer letter, if not a contract);
3) Given the 6 month vetting period, a court could also hold that it would not be reasonable to hold a promise binding for half-a-year--that is, that given so long a period of time, you should have expected the job, pay, and/or benefits would or could change.
If a court were to enforce promissory estoppel, it might order the payment of compensation or that you get the benefits; but again, this is a longshot.
If there are 26 of you, all--or at least a group of you--should get together to consult in detail with an employment law attorney about your options and the chances of legal action.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.