The Wizard of Oz, Gone with the Wind, Movie Posters, and Public Domain
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Apr 22, 2017
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
A long-running dispute over art from a vintage movie poster has finally ended with a victory for the Warner Bros. movie studio.
Warner holds the registered copyrights for the movie versions of The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind and for the Tom and Jerry cartoons.
Warner also owns trademarks for various images, characters, character names, phrases, and symbols from these works. X One X Productions, A.V.E.L.A., Inc., Art-Nostalgia.com, Inc., and Leo Valencia (collectively, “AVELA”) obtained movie posters and lobby cards for the movies and “extracted” images of characters like Dorothy, the Tin Man, and Scarlett O’Hara.
Lunch Boxes and Playing Cards
As the Hollywood Reporter reported, AVELA then licensed those images for use on products such as shirts, lunch boxes, and playing cards.
In some cases, the photos were used next to catch phrases from the movies. For example, a photo of Clark Gable as Rhett Butler would appear next to his line “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.” Warner sued in 2006, asserting copyright and trademark infringement.
AVELA claimed that the images were in the public domain. The original posters had been distributed without copyright notices. Given the law at the time (more than 60 years ago), the copyright has since lapsed.
In 2011, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected AVELA’s argument, finding that:
the scope of the film copyrights covers all visual depictions of the film characters at issue, except for any aspects of the characters that were injected into the public domain by the publicity materials.
Thus, the court found that AVELA had the right to reprint the old posters in their entirety, but not to extract and re-use images from the posters.
The case went back to a lower court, which awarded statutory damages of $10,000 for each of the 257 copyrighted works involved — $2,570,000 in total.
AVELA had claimed that it earned only $70,390 from the infringement, but Variety reported that the district court didn’t buy that.
In a copyright infringement case, the copyright owner can choose whether to get actual damages suffered and any profits of the infringer, or statutory damages.
Statutory damages can be no less than $750 and no more than $30,000 for each act of infringement.
If the infringement was “willful,” statutory damages can be increased to $150,000.
For example, one illegal copy can be considered an “act of infringement.”
The judge also enjoined AVELA from any further licensing of the extracted images or phrases from the movies or cartoons.
AVELA appealed again. On the trademark issue, the 8th Circuit noted that:
The district court found and AVELA did not dispute that Warner holds registered trademarks in iconic phrases and names from the films and has used the character images for trademark purposes on a host of consumer goods for many years.
The court then affirmed the lower court’s judgment in favor of Warner and the award of damages.