Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 20, 2013

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Three judges normally are assigned to decide each federal appeal, except under certain circumstances. If two of the three judges agree on the decision on the appeal, that becomes the decision of the federal appeals court. Very rarely, the federal appeals court will grant a motion for rehearing the appeal (by the same three judges) or a rehearing “en banc”, by all or most of the active judges on that particular Circuit Court of Appeals.

Under federal law, an appeal can never be decided by only one judge. Doing so would defeat the purpose of the appeal court’s ability to review cases. By requiring multiple judges to hear a case, it ensures a better mix of judges and ideally an efficient means of eliminating any prejudices.

The federal appeals court is a busy place. In fact, there are actually 13 United States Appeals courts all of whom are constantly reviewing cases from the trial court. As is stated by federal law, every aggrieved party has an appeal by right, so the appeals court remains a very busy place. With so many cases to review and hear, it is no surprise that most cases are reviewed or “heard” by three appeal judges in federal appeals court.

There are times when more than just three judges hear a case. En banc is a French term that means, on the bench. It is used to describe cases where the entire group of federal judges for that district hear the case, instead of simply a panel. In cases that involve complex matters of law or have serious social implications, the court will order an en banc rehearing. In addition, an en banc rehearing can be granted if the panel’s decision was somehow incorrect. En banc reviews may be made at the request of either the parties or the panel, but are not guaranteed.