How can we prove that the landlord is covering up old stains?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
How can we prove that the landlord is covering up old stains?
The previous resident had a dog and a kid. The carpets were cleaned and given to us. When we moved in, the carpets were slightly discolored but nothing worth noting on our move in sheet. When we moved out, we were charged $573 for carpet replacement. Upon a walkthrough 2weeks after our move-out, we were informed that these were permanent pet stains. They accused us of taking in cats. We never had any pets. They’re refusing to believe the previous resident had a dog without telling them. We’re taking them to court. We have photographs during our stay but not at immediate move-in or move-out.
Asked on September 5, 2010 under Real Estate Law, Florida
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
As a practical matter, you may not be able to prove that the stains were pre-existing:
1) You did not note anything on the move-in sheet, which creates a presumption that there were no stains, no damage, etc. The fact of signing a move-in sheet that does not state that there were stains means you agreed there were no stains, and it would be very difficult to overcome that.
2) Photographs that were not at the exact time of move in will carry little weight, since the stains could have come about after you moved in, but before the photos.
Given the cost of trying to fight or litigate this, and the lack of good evidence on your part, you may wish to consider paying the cost. Next time, note all stains or problems on the move-in sheet.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.