Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 20, 2013

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

There is no single or easy answer to this question, as it depends on the circumstances. It is the case that schools have considerable discretion in searching students, and students have less privacy rights while in school than adults. Behavior that would never be allowable vis-à-vis an adult will sometimes be permissible with regard to a student in grades K – 12.

That said, normally, schools may not strip search students. However, extraordinary circumstances might justify it, or least substantially moderate any liability that the school or school employees might have after the fact. For example, if there was credible evidence or reason to believe that a student was armed and was planning a Columbine-like event—or any attack on another student or teacher—that might justify strip searching the student to determine if he or she was in fact armed. Similarly, one can posit situations where it’s believed a student has a toxic chemical, drug, or even homemade bio weapon, or one in which it’s believed that a student is suicidal and represents a threat to him or herself – here, a strip search may be allowed, or at least effectively ratified after the fact. (For an example of effective ratification, consider the situation where a court concludes the school acted improperly—but refuses to impose any liability).

These are clearly extreme circumstances. In the vast majority of circumstances, a strip search would be clearly and unequivocally improper. However, bearing in mind the lesser rights of children as opposed to adults, as well as a school’s responsibility to safeguard the children in their care, it’s impossible to say that such a strip search would never be allowed.

If one were done, in evaluating whether it was at all proper, the following sorts of factors would be weighed:

  • The immediacy of any harm or threat;
  • The source and reliability of the information triggering the search;
  • Alternatives to the strip search;
  • How the search was conducted (e.g. a female teacher or nurse for a female student).

However, whether or not the search would be ratified as necessary and done properly, the student’s parents absolutely should be notified as soon as possible.