Can I be held liable for anything if the non-profit organization, that I am no longer involved in, doesn’t remove my name as an authorized signer from theichecking account?

Asked on July 24, 2014 under Business Law, Illinois


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 6 years ago | Contributor

Legally, if you are not longer employed there, you should not be liable for any amounts (and generally, an employee is not liable for his/her employer's debts unless the employee did something wrong, too, or unless the employee guaranteed the debt in some way). On the other hand, you never want to be connected to an account that you don't actually control, since there's always the *chance* for liability to arise somehow--e.g. if someone else embezzles or steals by signing a check with your name, making it look like you used your residual check signing authority to do this. Tell the company to remove your name and also go straight to the bank, with evidence that you no longer work there, and ask them to get your name off the account.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.