Canmy HOAsue me for reporting security guard not doing work correctly to his boss instead ofthe HOAdirectly?

I am a renter that has noticed the security guard doing things he shouldn’t be doing. I have been contacting the security guards boss directly about it because the security boss doesn’t want management to be aware. The HOA president told me that property management is thinking of suing me for harassment of a vendor.

Asked on October 18, 2011 under Real Estate Law, California


SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 9 years ago | Contributor

There is no such cause of action as "harassment of a vendor." IF the guard felt you were harassing him in some way--e.g. you were constantly following him to see where and what he was doing--or if the vendor felt you were harassing it or some of its employees in some fashion (e.g. repeated calls, at all hours), then it's possible they would be able to take some action. But a third party--e.g. your HOA--cannot sue  you for "harassing" one of its vendors. The closest they could come to some cause of action might be "tortious interference with economic advantage" or with a business relationship, but that generally requires that the intereference be something itself wrongful--making threats, physical interference, etc. A few phone calls should not give rise to this cause of action.

All the above aside: the guard reports to the vendor, and the vendor reports to the people that hired it (the HOA). You have no ability to make the guard or vendor do anything they don't want to. If you've brought this to everyone's attention, there is little to be gained by continued contacts or phone calls, and at some point, enough calls *could* cross the line into harassment or tortiuos interference. While, as noted, it's very unlikely there is any cause of action yet, you may wish to rethink whether you should continue with these phone calls.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.