What types of cases do different state courts handle?

Among the many protections set in place by the US constitution are limitations on exactly what federal court has jurisdiction over. These protections were established in Article III of the Constitution, and limited the power of the Federal government (and the federal court system). Because the founders of the country wanted to ensure that too much power was not concentrated in a strong federal government, the state courts actually have more rights to hear different cases than the federal courts do. So, the answer to what the different state cases handle is fairly broad- they are courts of “general” jurisdiction and can hear cases that deal with everything that the federal courts don’t have an exclusive right to deal with.

Understanding State Court Power

The kind of cases that a court gets to hear are determined by the “subject matter jurisdiction” that the court has. A federal court has exclusive jurisdiction (i.e. is the only court that gets to hear) cases arising out of the US Constitution, as well as some other limited types of cases like bankruptcy cases and tax cases. Other than these limited excepts, state courts can handle pretty much everything else.

Thus, state courts get to hear cases about, among other things:

• Family law issues (divorce, adoption, child custody, etc.)
• Criminal matters
• Wills and trusts
• Property disputes

State courts can sometimes even hear cases where federal laws are involved, as long as there isn’t “exclusive” federal jurisdiction. This means if you have a case, there is a good chance it’s going to be heard in a state court unless there are special circumstances.

Within the states, the courts generally operate under a two-or three-tier system, so you may have a few different courts that you can bring your case in. For example, Small Claims or Municipal Court might have jurisdiction over disputes where less than $5,000 is at stake, while the County Court or District Court may hear controversies where the amount at issue is up to $25,000 and Superior Court may hear controversies in excess of $25,000

If you are confused about what court you should bring your case in, it is always in your best interests to talk to a lawyer.

Case Studies: Types of Cases in State Courts

Case Study 1: Personal Injury Lawsuit

Emily, a pedestrian, was crossing the street at a marked crosswalk when she was struck by a distracted driver. As a result of the accident, Emily sustained serious injuries and incurred significant medical expenses. Seeking justice and compensation for her damages, Emily decided to file a personal injury lawsuit against the negligent driver.

Emily’s attorney prepared her case and filed it in the appropriate state court, which had subject matter jurisdiction over personal injury claims. The court proceedings included gathering evidence, conducting depositions, and presenting expert testimonies to establish the driver’s negligence and the extent of Emily’s injuries.

Case Study 2: Family Law Dispute

Sarah and John, a married couple with two children, decided to end their marriage due to irreconcilable differences. They faced various challenges related to child custody, child support, and the division of marital assets. Both Sarah and John wanted to protect their children’s best interests while ensuring a fair distribution of their shared property.

Sarah and John hired family law attorneys to guide them through the divorce process and represent their respective interests in the state court. The court, which had subject matter jurisdiction over family law matters, facilitated negotiations between the parties and encouraged them to reach a mutually agreeable resolution.

With the assistance of their attorneys, Sarah and John engaged in mediation sessions to address their concerns and find common ground. After several productive discussions, they reached a comprehensive settlement agreement that addressed custody arrangements, child support obligations, and property division.

Case Study 3: Contract Dispute

Greenway Construction, a construction company, entered into a contract with Quality Supplies Company, a supplier, for the delivery of construction materials for a large-scale project. However, a dispute arose when the materials delivered by Quality Supplies Company did not meet the agreed-upon specifications, causing delays and financial losses for Greenway Construction.

Unable to resolve the issue through negotiation, Greenway Construction decided to initiate a contract dispute lawsuit against Quality Supplies Company in the state court, which had subject matter jurisdiction over contract disputes. Greenway Construction’s legal team prepared a strong case by gathering evidence, consulting industry experts, and analyzing the contractual terms.