What evidence is needed to arrest someone suspected of drunk driving?
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Jun 19, 2018
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Despite all of the TV shows in which the police always say “you are under arrest,” for purposes of a defendant’s rights under U.S. laws, an arrest may occur long before those words are uttered. The courts have concluded that an arrest occurs when a reasonable person would conclude that his or her freedom has been significantly limited and that the suspect reasonably believes he is not free to leave.
Generally speaking, there are four types of evidence that a police officer will consider and gather in a drunk driving investigation: gross observations of behavior in general; specific observations of what are known as “field sobriety tests” (FST); information obtained from questioning the suspect; and chemical test results of the motorist’s blood, breath or urine.
A police officer may arrest a motorist for drunk driving if the cumulative effect of the evidence convinces the officer that he has “probable cause” or “reasonable cause” to make an arrest. This is a far lower standard than the one the state must prove at trial where the case must be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Although this is a high standard, it is met every day in courts all over the country.