Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 6, 2020

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

When an individual commits the crime of false pretenses, they misrepresent a fact in order to acquire someone else’s property. Obtaining property through false pretenses is a crime, punishable in most states by fines and imprisonment. While state laws vary in defining this crime, the general idea is the same: to be found guilty of false pretenses, the prosecutor must show that the individual acquired the property at issue by intentionally misstating a fact. This means that if an individual obtains another’s property by stating a fact that they mistakenly believe to be true, they have not committed the crime of false pretenses. Depending on the state statute, the property acquired by false pretenses can include tangible property, like a car or house, and intangible property, such as information that has been obtained.

False Pretenses vs. Larceny-by-Trick

False pretenses is often confused with the crime of larceny-by-trick. Larceny-by-trick is almost identical to the crime of false pretenses. However, there is one big difference: In the crime of false pretenses, the title to the property is actually transferred to the perpetrator, whereas someone found guilty of larceny-by-trick does not hold the title. A party commits larceny-by-trick when they steal another party’s property by deception. Therefore, no actual transfer of title occurs with larceny-by-trick. For instance, if an individual tells an elderly man that she is his long-lost daughter with the intent of causing him to transfer the title of his vacation house to her, she has committed the crime of false pretenses. If, instead, the individual convinced the elderly man that she was just going to borrow his car but never came back with it, this would be larceny or larceny-by-trick.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

False Pretenses vs. Fraudulent Misrepresentation

The crime of false pretenses has a civil counterpart as well: a civil cause of action known as fraudulent misrepresentation. While fraudulent misrepresentation has the same legal elements as false pretenses, the court system in which a party will be charged for the crime differs. If a party intentionally deceives another, causing them to transfer title of their property, the city or state will prosecute the perpetrator for the crime of false pretenses. However, to allow the victim a remedy for the crime, the civil courts allow an individual to bring a fraudulent misrepresentation action for damages against the thief.

Getting Legal Help

If you believe that you have been defrauded by false pretenses, contact the appropriate authorities. On the other hand, if you have been accused of defrauding by false pretenses, speak to a criminal defense attorney right away. Being found guilty of the crime of false pretenses carries with it the possibility of severe punishment, and you will benefit from having a knowledgeable criminal defense lawyer on your side.