Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 4, 2020

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

An intervening cause is a separate action that breaks the direct connection between the actions of the defendant and a loss or injury to another person. Usually intervening causes are actions by a third party or natural occurrence that alter the circumstances of accident.  As a result, intervening cause may be used as a legal defense in a civil lawsuit.

Nature of Intervening Causes

In a personal injury lawsuit, the plaintiff must demonstrate through the facts of his or her case, that the defendant was negligent, and that the defendant’s negligent behavior was the cause of the harm that the plaintiff suffered. A defendant may generally be able to avoid liability by showing that there was an event that took place in the time between the defendant’s actions and the plaintiff’s injury that was sufficient to replace the defendant as the actual cause of the harm the plaintiff suffered. This event is the intervening cause.

The existence of an intervening event does not automatically mean it will get the defendant off the hook.  Foreseeability is often the key to the validity of an intervening cause. If the foreseeability of the harmful act itself, and of the injury that was caused, are established regardless of the intervening event, then the defendant is likely liable regardless.

Examples of Intervening Causes

Not all events can be used as an intervening cause to avoid liability. The event as well as the resulting injury must have been unforeseeable to a reasonable person. For example, imagine that Neighbor A’s house is being renovated, and that he asks Neighbor B if he might store his car in Neighbor B’s driveway during the renovation. Neighbor B agrees. One day, Neighbor B decides to park A’s car on the street in order to do a project in her driveway. She leaves the car parked on the street for several days, during which time a hurricane blows through the area, damaging the car. 

Neighbor A sues Neighbor B for the damage to his car, claiming she was negligent and careless to park the car on the street rather than keeping it in the driveway. Neighbor B responds that the hurricane was an intervening cause between her negligence and the damage to the car and that, in actuality, the hurricane was the actual cause of the harm to the car. Neighbor B can further assert that it was unforeseeable that the car would be damaged by moving it from the driveway to the street. Such a defense could help Neighbor B avoid liability for the damage done to Neighbor A’s car.

Getting Help

If you are a defendant in a lawsuit, and you believe that an intervening cause is responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries, talk to a qualified personal injury attorney. An attorney experienced in negligence lawsuits could help you determine whether the facts of your case support using an intervening cause as a defense.