What to do if I got fired for not complying to 40 hours a week even though I followed proper protocol for sick time 2 weeks in a row?

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

What to do if I got fired for not complying to 40 hours a week even though I followed proper protocol for sick time 2 weeks in a row?

I suffer from chronic migraines (since I was 4 years old). I was late a few days over my probation period (90 days) and I was given a warning. During a migraine, my boss did not receive my message regarding my absence, so he filed a no-call-no-show, which I disagreed with. I was told to not be late again. However, within 2 weeks I was sick 2 days in a row with a fever of over 101 (which company wide e-mail said to not come in due to norovirus making its way through the office), then 2 days with a migraine on a new medication. The bosses were aware of the new meds after a meeting. Do I have a leg to stand on?

Asked on May 24, 2012 under Employment Labor Law, Massachusetts

Answers:

SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 9 years ago | Contributor

Unfortunately, you most likely do not have a leg to stand on. Employers are not obligated to allow employees to take time off for illness, and may fire employees who miss work or are late due to illness, except as below:

1) The employee had and properly used sick days which he or she had earned or accrued (or some other PTO he/she could use for this purpose).

2) The employer authorized the lateness or absence.

3) The employee took FMLA leave--which you would not have been eligible for if you had recently started.

4) Also, employees have to make "reasonable" accomodations to employees with disabilities--but it's not at all clear your migraines would qualify as a disability, and even if it did, allowing you to miss work is not a required accomodation.

Therefore, it appears that, from what you write, your termination was legal.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption