Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 3, 2020

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Offering police misconduct as a defense means you’ll have to prove the actual amount that was in the cash box, admit to the offense, and then hope that the police will admit to the theft. Most criminal defense attorneys will advise you that this is an incredibly risky defense because it could actually bolster the case against you. Chances are that the allegation could lead to a police internal affairs investigation, but not a dismissal of the drug charges against you.

Proving a Police Misconduct Defense

The first part of your defense is proving the amount of funds that were in the cash box. To prove this with certainty, you will have to produce some type of documentation as to your activities. This may involve your having to divulge the identity of others involved in your drug dealings, which means that, in addition to seeking a conviction against you, the police might then open an investigation of your buddies. You must also prove that you were the only one who had access to the drug money prior to the raid. Of course, demonstrating exclusive possession only serves to enhance your chances of being convicted.

The second part of your defense involves admitting that the money was drug money. Most judges and juries are not sympathetic to people who deal drugs. Your admission to drug dealing and your claim that you actually had a higher amount of money than the police report indicated will only serve to convince the judge that you are a bigger dealer than the prosecution originally believed. Neither judge nor jury is likely to feel sad that money was stolen from you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Find an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney

The third part of your defense is getting the police to admit that they stole the money. Most officers are not going to be eager to admit to that type of charge. This part of your defense is best handled by an experienced criminal defense attorney who can investigate and make inquiries without you having to make any direct admissions. For example, your attorney can file discovery motions that include the right to inspect and recount the drug money seized. They can look for discrepancies, compare police reports, inventory sheets, etc. Many states require police agencies to file a notice of seizure in a separate civil proceeding if they intend to keep the money. Your attorney can file motions for discovery and inspection in that case as well.

Your attorney can also request notice of any prior complaints against the officer(s) who took the drug money into evidence to see if this same issue has come up before. You will have a better chance of getting your case thrown out if the issue of stolen money has come up multiple times with the same officer.

Search Warrants

Even assuming that you can develop a majority of these factors, the most that you can probably hope for is an internal affairs investigation. The law only requires that the evidence used against you be obtained legally. If the search warrant was a valid warrant, and drugs were found during the raid, the evidence was seized legally. Most courts will view an allegation of police misconduct as a jury issue, meaning it goes to the credibility of the evidence and testimony, but it does not bar the admission of the evidence. In the end, you will probably still be charged with possession of a controlled substance.