What to do about a civil liability claim regarding a retail theft?

Get Legal Help Today

Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

What to do about a civil liability claim regarding a retail theft?

I received a settlement offer from a law firm representing a company. I was never charged with an offense but they are still looking for damages. I was in the store buying items and I started to return the items when my new born started crying. So I put them on top of the stroller and picked him up. My 2 year old ran off so I put my child down and chased after him. I grabbed him, went back to the stroller, and immediately went to pay for other items forgetting about the ones in the stroller. Is that considered intent? Is it worth fighting in court or should I pay the $375 they’re asking for?

Asked on December 9, 2010 under Criminal Law, Wisconsin

Answers:

SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney

Answered 13 years ago | Contributor

For civil liability--i.e. it's not a criminal case against you--the store may sue you for the value of the items you took and can likely recover some collection or legal fees. It's not a function of "intent" for a matter like this--if you took items that did not belong to you for any reason, you are liable for them.

If you try to fight it, you could--assuming the items are in returnable shape--probably not have to pay for them as long as you return them, but you would still likely have to pay some court, legal, and/or collection costs (i.e. they'd likely be awarded something). If the $375 is significant to you, you should probably try to negotiate it down and/or go to court and see if you can get it reduced; but since you'll likely have to pay *something* anyway, if you can afford the $375, it might be best to pay and get a settlement prohibiting them from taking any other action on it, just to be done.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption