Will my new retail theft charges be considered my first offense, due to other charges being dropped previously?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Will my new retail theft charges be considered my first offense, due to other charges being dropped previously?
5 months ago I was charged with retail theft in an amount exceeding $150. However my attorney got the charge dropped in court. A couple of days ago I was again charged with retail theft in which the amount was under $100. Will these new charges be considered a first offense since the others charge was dropped and will the old/dropped retail theft charge have any bearing on the legal ramifications I suffer from new retail theft charge?
Asked on October 10, 2011 under Criminal Law, Pennsylvania
Answers:
FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 12 years ago | Contributor
If you had been arrested previously for an offense but you never plead guilty, no contest or convicted as to the prior charges but the action was dismissed, then you have nothing negative on your record as to that proceeding.
As such, the new retail theft charges if you plea out or are convicted for them would be your first offense based upon what you have written. Since the prior charges were dismissed, they would have no bearing on your current situation.
I recommend that you consult with a criminal defense attorney about the current charges.
Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.