What legal options do I have?
UPDATED: Oct 1, 2022
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What legal options do I have?
Hi, My left ear has been blocked for about 2 months.
I went to the doctor and initial diagnosis was wax in
my right ear 10/24 – I went in for my left ear. They
cleaned my right ear and sent me home. A week
later, I went back because there was no change to
my left ear – new diagnosis was dysfunction of
Eustachian tube fluid in middle ear. I started a
treatment plan, but after weeks of no change I went
back on 11/29 – doctor cleared my ear and said
nothing is wrong even with me explaining that
symptoms had worsened. This past weekend, I went
to my work company party and every time there was
clapping I was in a lot of pain. I went back 12/6 and
insisted she take another looknot only was there
still an issue with fluid in my ear, it’s now behind my
eardrum and has caused an infection. I was put on a
course of antibiotics right away to prevent hearing
loss from the infection.
Asked on December 7, 2017 under Malpractice Law, California
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 5 years ago | Contributor
If it was malpractice, you could theoretically sue, but the problem is that you can only get compensation equivalent to the additional medical costs you incurred due to the misdiagnosis and some amount for "pain and suffering" for significant disability and life impairment lasting generally many weeks or months or more. For what you describe, the amount of compensation you could receive would typically be small--very possibly less than the cost of the lawsuit, since malpractice cases can be very expensive (even if you were to be your own attorney or "pro se"--which is *not * recommended--you'd have to hire and pay for a medical expert to examine you, write a report, and testify in court, which can easily cost $1,500 - $3,000 or more).]
It would only be malpractice in the first place if the diagnose was neglient or unreasonable careless. It's not enough that it was wrong; the law accepts that doctors sometimes get things wrong. It would have to be a diagnosis that (essentially) no reasonable doctor would have made under those circumstances to be malpractic and give rise to any liability.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.