What is the statute of limitations for medical malpractice?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What is the statute of limitations for medical malpractice?
Asked on March 22, 2013 under Malpractice Law, California
Answers:
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 11 years ago | Contributor
A medical malpractice action in CA must be brought within 1 year from the date the claimant discovered the negligent act but no more than 3 years from the date of the injury. That having been said, regaring retained foreign body suits, the statute is "tolled" (i.e. temporarily stopped) until the claimant discovers or should have discovered the injury. Additionally, cases by or on behalf of minors must be brought within 3 years from the date of the negligence, unless the child is under the age of 6, in which case it must be be brought within 3 years or prior to the child’s 8th birthday, whichever provides a greater time period.
However, this whole area has other considerations relating to the commencement of the limitations period, as well as just what acts are covered and by whom the negligence was committed. Therefore, if you think that you might have a legitimate malpractice claim, you should consult (and most such consultations are free) with an attorney who specializes in handling such cases.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.