What is are the differences between “technical” contempt and “willful” contempt?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What is are the differences between “technical” contempt and “willful” contempt?
I was recently found guilty of “technical” contempt and ordered to pay legal fees of the opposing party. What is “willful” contempt? Is there a major difference?
Asked on July 2, 2012 under Family Law, Rhode Island
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 11 years ago | Contributor
Willful contempt occurs when it can be properly proven that you knew of a court order and despite the ability to comply with that order chose not to do so or opted to do something that the party felt was in his or her own best interests or the best interests of his or her family despite an order to the contrary.
Technical contempt occurs when it is proven to the judge that you did not comply with that order because you did not have the means or the power to comply with the courts order.
So the first is deliberate and the second not deliberate so the nature of the non-compliance that designates what type of contempt it is. Now, it is rare that you would be found guilty of technical contempt and attorney fees awarede. That is usually in cases of willful contempt. Please go and speak with a lawyer in your area. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.