What am I entitled to?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What am I entitled to?
My ex and I divorced in November of 2006. We jointly owned property in Alabama. In June of 2007, I moved back to Florida. We did not settle our property in Alabama and to this day my name is still on the deed. He has since remarried and wants me off the deed. He said he sought legal advice and they said that since I haven’t paid on it since our divorce then I’m not entitled to any of it and he can build a house without my signature or getting off the deed. He wants to offer me 3000 which is not acceptable to me. Is his information correct?
Asked on July 6, 2016 under Family Law, Florida
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 6 years ago | Contributor
No, he is wrong. (Which is why you should never take legal advice from the other side or party, who has his own agenda.) If the two of you are on the deed, you are a 50% owner: you have an equal say in what happens to the property (i.e. he can't do anything with it unilaterally) and, were it to be sold, would get 50% of the proceeds.
The above said:
1) When the two owners of real estate disagree as what should be done with it, either can bring an action "for partition" in court: that is, either owner can bring a lawsuit requesting a court either physically divide the property (as may be practical with an unimproved lot) or else order the sale of the property and the division of the proceeds.
2) If your ex has paid more than you on the property, he does have a good case that he should be credited for such amount in any sale, etc. While it's not certain he'd prevail on that argument, there's at least a chance that a court would credit him for his payments. So say that he has paid $80,000 over 10 years in property taxes, while you have not. Say the property were sold, or its sale ordered by a court, for $400,000 profit...he could make a good argument, and might win on, the position that instead of splitting the profit $200k/$200k, it should be split $240k/$160k to reflect that he paid the necessary taxes while you did not.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.