The Wire Act
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Dec 13, 2018
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
The “wire” in the Interstate Wire Wager Act of 1961, 18 U.S.C. Section 1084 (or as it is simply called, The Wire Act), may have originally been telephones (given the technology back then), but further court interpretations have expanded the coverage of the Wire Act to apply to internet operators. The original purpose of the Wire Act – before the internet was invented — was to help cut off one of organized crime’s main sources of revenue, the interstate transfer of bets and wagers through telecommunications. As the result of the tremendous growth of the Internet, the Act was applied to any online or internet gambling.
The Wire Act says that “Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”
Effect of Wire Act
There were some limitations on the Wire Act’s reach or applicability. For example, it applies to those who are “in the business of betting or wagering” in interstate or foreign commerce—that is, it went to those who operated online gambling businesses (i.e., taking bets on sports events by phone) across borders, not the casual bettor or customer of a bookie. This came out of the Act’s purpose: to shut down one of organized crime’s major revenue sources. The Act was not used against the individual players placing bets.
The Act also had a “safe harbor,” or provision taking some betting transactions out from under the Act’s prohibition. If the betting information, etc., was transmitted from one place where it was legal to another place where it was also legal, then it was not prohibited under the Wire Act. This again came from the Act’s purpose: to reduce or eliminate illegal gambling, not state-approved gambling. Legal gambling was not provided by organized crime. That’s why Off-Track Betting (OTB), where state-licensed shops could take bets on distant horse races, was not barred by the Wire Act. Since states authorized the OTB operations, the transmission of betting-related information was legal.
However, while there were some limitations on the Act’s applicability, in other ways, its reach expanded beyond the Act’s drafter’s original intentions. For many years, the language in the Act — “the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers” — was read very broadly or expansively, so that the Wire Act was considered to make all online, internet, or remote gambling in the United States illegal, since you can’t gamble online or remotely without the transmission of information about the bet or wager.
In addition to the Wire Act, Congress passed other special laws that have applicability to on-line gambling, such as the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). Despite the reach of the Wire Act, online gambling is only legal if it complies with the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act.
Justice Department interpretation
In 2011, on President Obama’s watch, the Justice Department changed its position and put out a statement that in its opinion, the Wire Act applied only to sports wagering or betting and not other forms of gambling. Without the threat of Justice Department action, states were free to begin allowing online poker and casino-style games, as a number of states (i.e., New Jersey) have done. The Wire Act has not formally been changed: the law still says what it says, and only the current interpretation has changed. The Justice Department could reverse itself again and take the position that the Wire Act does bar all online gambling.
At least one Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (the Fifth Circuit, covering parts of the Midwest) has concluded, in-line with the Justice Department’s 2011 statement, that the Wire Act does only apply to sports betting. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, has not yet weighed in on the subject. Until the Supreme Court issues a definitive ruling, it’s not impossible that the former interpretation could be reinstated and upheld. It therefore could be the case that the Wire Act does ban all internet gambling, since the issue has not been put to the test in final ruling.
As of December 2018, the date of publication, interstate online sports betting is illegal under the Wire Act—which is why that states who are now instituting sports betting are only doing so within their own borders and are not taking bets from players outside the state. Other online gambling appears to be legal under the Wire Act, but we can’t yet be 100% certain that it will always remain legal.
Our article on “States That Allow Gambling” breakdowns the types or forms of gambling that are currently legalized in the state.