Stryker’s Latest Hip Implant Recall Leads to Lawsuits

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Jul 16, 2021

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

In July 2012, Stryker Corporation issued a Class 1 recall of its latest hip implant models, the Rejuvenate and ABG II implants.  A Class 1 recall is issued when the product creates a substantial risk of serious harm to patients, and every patient who received a Stryker hip implant should consult their physician immediately.

Defects Leading to Stryker’s Hip Implant Recall

Stryker’s latest recall came after patients experienced significant pain after the products were installed, and it became apparent that the neck and stem components were rubbing together.  The friction between the parts of the implant caused metal fragments to break off the implant and enter the blood stream, leading to a condition known as metallosis.  Although the full health risks associated with metallosis are not know, the condition causes significant pain and damages the surrounding tissue.

In order to correct the problems created by the Rejuvenate and ABG II models, patients will need to undergo a painful corrective surgery.  The revision surgery will not only cause significant discomfort, but will increase the amount of time required to rehabilitate after hip surgery.  Patients who have had Stryker hip implants installed should first ensure they are getting the appropriate health care, and second consult an attorney for the possibility of legal action.

In the wake of Stryker’s recent hip implant recall, attorneys will consult with injured patients and begin filing lawsuits against the company to ensure injured parties are properly compensated.

Why Stryker is Liable for Injuries

Stryker is liable for the injuries to patients because it manufactured and released onto the market a defective product that caused serious injury.  Stryker may have further weakened its position in this case because it released both the Rejuvenate and ABG II hip implants without first testing them.  Stryker bypassed testing under the FDA’s 510(k) exemption that allows companies releasing products on to the market to do so without testing if they can show the new product is similar to one that already exists.  Stryker released its latest hip implants without first testing them, and may have missed the opportunity to detect and correct the problems that caused patients injury.

By releasing its implants without testing them, Stryker effectively made all the patients who had the Rejuvenate and ABG II models installed test subjects by monitoring how the implants performed after surgery.  Stryker was unable to foresee the problems that caused patient injury because the company was not require to perform premarket testing, and the decision to fast track its newest implants will likely cost the company in upcoming lawsuits.

Damages Available in Stryker Hip Implant Lawsuits

Before filing a lawsuit against Stryker for injuries caused by defective hip implants, it is important to be aware of the types of damages available.  Patients injured by the Stryker Rejuvenate or ABG II hip implants should claim the following:

  • Damages for pain and suffering, which factors in the pain of additional surgeries, and the negative effect multiple hip surgeries will have later in life
  • Damages for out of pocket medical costs, including additional corrective surgeries
  • Damages for past, current, and future loss of wage earnings
  • The potential for punitive damages because the products were released without clinical tests

Regardless of what damages are available in each particular case, it is critical that an injured patient be able to prove that they suffered a particular loss.   An injured patient considering litigation should document every expense and loss associated with the injuries caused by a Stryker hip implant. From the initial surgery, to follow up medical care, to doctor visits, to corrective surgery, to communications with an insurance company, every single incident throughout the process needs to be documented. 

An experienced attorney is critical to the success of a Stryker hip implant lawsuit, so be sure to contact one if you or a loved one has experienced problems with Stryker’s Rejuvenate or ABG II models. The injuries associated with Stryker’s latest hip implant models can be serious, and the compensation owed can be significant.  Contact an attorney to determine if you eligible to join lawsuit.

Suffered harm from a defective Stryker Hip Implant? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights. [Sponsored link]

Check out the following articles for more information about Stryker Hip Implants, filing a Stryker Hip Implant lawsuit and finding a Stryker Hip Implant attorney.

Suffered harm from a defective Stryker Hip Implant? You may have a lawsuit. Click here, for a top rated law firm to evaluate your legal rights. [Sponsored link]


Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption