Some Immigrants May Pursue Their Removal Cases From Outside the U.S.
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Oct 10, 2012
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a regulation last week that barred noncitizens from pursuing their immigration cases after removal or deportation. (Lari v. Holder) The eleven circuit courts of appeal across the U.S. are currently split over the legality of “departure bars,” regulations that prevent immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals from adjudicating motions brought to reconsider or reopen a removal case after the noncitizen has left the U.S. Such motions are often brought when new evidence or new legal arguments are discovered that could possibly change the outcome of the removal decision. The 5th Circuit now joins seven other circuit courts that have struck down these regulations, and these include the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 9th, 10th and 11th circuits. For more about the Circuit Courts of Appeal and the territory covered by each circuit, use the Court Locator.
For more on removal proceedings and the right to representation, see Your Rights as an Unrepresented Immigrant in Removal Proceedings.