School Immigration Status Checks in Alabama Ruled Unconstitutional

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Sep 4, 2012

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

U.S. ImmigrationAn especially controversial Alabama immigration law (HB 56, Section 28) was struck down by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on August 20, 2012 as violating the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. Alabama’s law required all students newly enrolling in a public elementary or secondary school in Alabama to provide the child’s birth certificate, or a certified copy of it, at the time of enrollment. Schools were then to determine if the child was born in the United States, and if not, whether or not the child was in the U.S. legally. Parents were required, within 30 days of enrollment, to provide official documentation of the child’s legal status or a notarized copy. If parents did not have the documentation, they could opt to sign a declaration stating that their child is in the U.S. legally. If parents did none of the above, the child was presumed to be in the country illegally. Schools were also required to keep a record of the number of legal and illegal immigrants in the schools.

In Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama vs. Governor of Alabama, the 11th Circuit court panel viewed the blanket provision requiring birth certificates at enrollment as a way for the state to force families to expose their illegal status (or “concede it through silence.”), putting up barriers to education for undocumented children that violate the Supreme Court decision in Phyler vs. Doe. In that 1982 decision, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law that sought to withhold state education funding to and enrollment of children not in the U.S. legally. The Court recognized illegal aliens as “persons” pursuant to the Equal Protection clause and, therefore, entitled to an elementary education in the same way that legal and non-alien children are.

While the school immigration status check was held unconstitutional, a separate section allowing police officers to check the immigration status of people they have detained, similar to an Arizona law recently upheld by the Supreme Court, was allowed to stand.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption