Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Jul 31, 2013

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

A lease is a contract. As a contract, it is enforceable by the parties to the contract. That means that the landlord can enforce the lease against the tenants, or the tenants against the landlord. It also means that one tenant can enforce it against the other, if the second tenant breaches the lease. Only those terms in the lease can be enforced. For example, the first tenant could sue the second for her share of the rent, but if the lease does not mention utilities, may not be able to pursue a claim against her for outstanding gas or electric bills as part of the cause of action for payment of the lease.

From a tenant’s perspective, the main problem will often be that to the enforcement of the lease against a cotenant will require a lawsuit. Since lawsuits cost money, the tenant should first consider whether the breaching cotenant would actually be able to pay any award against her. If not, if realistically there is no way to collect from her (in which case, she’d be effectively “judgment proof”), then suing may be throwing bad money after good. An attorney experienced in landlord-tenant law can help the remaining tenant understand her rights, what she could expect to recover, and also the potential cost of taking legal action. Depending upon the dollar amount owed, small claims court may also be an option.

The other big problem is that the landlord has a right to the full rent, even if one of the people paying it has skipped out. As a result, if the remaining tenant does not pay on time, in full, the landlord could evict her. The remaining tenant needs to remain current on the total lease obligations, not just her share, even as she’s looking to recover from the breaching cotenant.

As a result, it may make sense for the remaining tenant to consider other options as well as suing the breaching tenant. Subletting, so as to get another roommate to pay the rent is one option. Another option might be to work with the landlord to have the breaching tenant removed from the lease and substitute another person on the lease. Again, a landlord-tenant attorney can help the remaining tenant understand her rights and recourse.