Proving the Case for a Variance
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Sep 18, 2013
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Being granted a variance from the local zoning rules can be an uphill battle for the homeowner who wants to change the permitted use of his land. The property owner might need to prove that the new use still preserves the appearance and ambience of neighboring properties, is applicable only to his unique piece of land, and not to surrounding properties, and, more importantly, the existing restrictions create a serious hardship on him. In evaluating the hardship, the local zoning board looks at the circumstances and general objectives of zoning in this neighborhood, the nature of the change, its effect on adjacent neighbors, and the practical difficulty in using the property.
If the owner applicant wants a variance in the size of the structure, the property owner must demonstrate that the project is modest, blends in with the essential character of the existing neighborhood, can’t be readily achieved in some other way, and if not granted, would cause an economic burden on the applicant.