Construction Defect Lawsuits: Common Causes of Action
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Aug 13, 2013
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Common causes of action in a construction defect lawsuit include breach of contract, breach of warranty, negligence, and strict liability.
Breach of Contract
In a breach of contract action, each party must have been a party to the contract. For example, the home buyer signs a contract with the builder to construct a house.They both sign a contract and the house is built. However, it is defective. This home buyer would have standing (the right) to bring a breach of contract claim against the builder. However, if the original home buyer sells the house to home buyer No. 2, he would generally not have standing to bring a breach of contract claim because he was not a party to the original contract.
Breach of warranty
A breach of warranty action is similar to a breach of contract claim, but generally arises out of the warranty given on the property. For example, the builder provides the homeowner with a one year warranty on the house. After six months, the homeowner discovers a crack in the foundation. That homeowner, and presumably the subsequent homeowner (if the first sold the house within one year), would have a breach of warranty claim against the builder. Most warranties are given only for a specific amount of time.
A negligence claim arises out of a breached duty of care which resulted in damages. For example, the builder of a home completes the project and the new homeowner moves in. However, the builder’s lawn subcontractor failed to fill in a large hole in the backyard and the new homeowner fell into the hole and was injured. The homeowner might have a negligence action against both the builder and the subcontractor for failing to fill in the hole.
Strict liability is the strongest theory of recovery available to the homeowner. In a construction defect case, the builder is strictly liable for defects regardless of whether he was negligent. For example, a builder constructs a house and installs hardwood floors that he believes to be of good quality. However, the floors are defective and warp a week after the new homeowner moves in. While the builder wasn’t necessarily negligent in installing the floors, he may be liable for the damages under a strict liability theory of recovery.
Unfortunately, some states limit who can be sued under strict liability. In California, only mass developers, those who construct many houses per year, can be held sued under this theory.
Every case is different and one or more of the above theories may apply to a single case. Consumers should seek a qualified construction defect attorney to determine who might be liable for the injuries and/or damages they’ve experienced.