Pro Se Complaint
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Pro Se Complaint
I am suing seller and their broker for earnest money. Both are listed as
defendants on the summons. My private investigator/process server was able to
serve the seller but not the broker. Is it absulutely necessary for the broker to
even be present since the seller was served to have a strong case to win? Even
if i ask the judge to drop the broker as a defendant. What are my chances of
winning the case with the seller and without the broker present?
Asked on April 7, 2016 under Real Estate Law, Illinois
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 7 years ago | Contributor
There's no way to answer your question about winning the case in terms of the subjective strength of your case, since there are no details provided.
The risk you have is that if the broker is an "indispensible party"--someone so integral the case and the rights of the other parties, including the seller--that the case cannot effectively or equitably be decided without the broker, the judge could dismiss the case for failure to join an indispensible party. Such a dismissal would generally be "without prejudice," which means that so long as the statue of limitations has not expired, you could re-file.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.