Mississippi Doctor Malpractice – $3.5M Award Patient’s Death
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Jan 10, 2020
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
The Mississippi Supreme Court recently upheld a $3.5 million jury award to the family of a terminally ill cancer patient who overdosed on pain pills in a hospice, but whose autopsy later showed that she did not have cancer at all.
The underlying medical malpractice case
The underlying medical malpractice case involves a woman who was diagnosed with COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pancreatic cancer. Terminally ill and with less than six months to live, she went into hospice and overdosed on pain killers. However, an autopsy revealed that she never had cancer. Her family sued the doctor who misdiagnosed her and a jury awarded them $3.5 million. Part of that award represented Loss of Chance Recovery. The physician alleged that he should not be responsible as the patient was terminally ill. The case made its way to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Loss of Chance Recovery defined
Loss of Chance Recovery is a doctrine that allows for damages when someone’s negligence deprived another of the opportunity to obtain a benefit or avoid a loss. In this case, the family alleged that the doctor’s negligence in misdiagnosing the terminally ill woman actually caused the woman’s death by overdose. The court agreed with the family and reasoned that:
Loss-of-chance-of-recovery theory instructions are generally submitted by plaintiffs in circumstances where a medical provider’s negligence does not cause a patient’s injury or death but arguably hindered the patient from achieving reasonably probable and substantial recovery from injury. [Here, the doctor] was alleged to have caused the death of [the patient] due to an overdose, not to have hindered [her] recovery.
Med Mal injuries and resulting damages
Medical malpractice claims are arguably one of the most difficult types of negligence cases to litigate. The injuries tend to be greater and the resulting damages higher than other types of negligence cases. In most situations, medical malpractice lawyers must consult with teams of experts and determine the value of damages such as Loss of Chance Recovery and others.
Don’t leave your medical malpractice claim to chance; consult with an experienced Mississippi medical malpractice attorney to discuss your situation. Consultations are free, without obligation and are strictly confidential.