Man Receives 2-Year Sentence for Perjury During Jury Selection
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Nov 16, 2012
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
A potential juror in Massachusetts has received a two year prison sentence for misleading the trial judge about his relationship with the parties to the crime. When 23-year old Jonathon G. Ngarambe was called for jury duty for a gang-rape case, he told the judge and prosecutor that he did not know any of the parties to the crime. After investigation, he admitted to lying to the judge during the jury selection process, and he now faces a stiff penalty.
Mr. Ngarambe aroused suspicion by making eye contact with a defendant during the jury selection process. Prosecutors followed up on him, and found that two of the defendants claimed that they knew Mr. Ngarambe personally. After coming under investigation, he admitted to knowing at least two of the defendants on trial, and having contact with the victim, who was his former high school classmate. With his lie revealed, Mr. Ngarambe pled guilty to perjury and received his two-year sentence.
Perjury is Lying Under Oath
Perjury is a willful act of dishonesty while under oath, and can include any verbal or written statement. The offense is considered serious because deceit can unfairly influence results in criminal proceedings, which weakens the power of American courts. In order to administer criminal justice, courts rely on the integrity of witnesses, attorneys, judges, and juror. As such, every party to a trial is sworn in to testify truthfully or face the penalty of perjury. Even though potential jurors have not yet heard the facts of the case or put into a position to influence the outcome, they face perjury charges if they mislead the court.
It’s Important to Tell the Truth During Jury Selection
When seating a jury, the Court’s primary concern is finding individuals who are able to offer an unbiased verdict based on the facts of the case. Potential jurors are required to disclose, under oath, any connection they have to the case or to the parties to the crime. During the process of selecting a jury, attorneys and judges ask the jurors a series of questions, and jurors must answer honestly or face perjury charges. Every statement a potential juror makes is under the threat of perjury, and dishonesty can result in criminal punishment.
A Serious Lesson
Courts make it abundantly clear to potential jurors that they are under oath, and the case of Mr. Ngarambe drives home exactly what that means. Although a two-year prison sentence seems severe for misleading a judge during jury selection, consider a court system without such stiff punishment deterring dishonesty in the courtroom. Jurors who have a connection with the parties to a crime cannot make an unbiased decision, which can call the entire justice system into question. Mr. Ngarambe’s case is a cautionary tale warning potential jurors of the consequences of lying to a judge or the attorneys during the jury selection process.