Making a “Federal Case” Out of It

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Jun 19, 2018

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

How did the saying “Making a Federal Case Out of It” come to mean ballooning a small issue into a bigger one? Its origins are clouded, but it seems to have made its first appearance around 1950. It is probably not coincidence that by the middle of the 20th century, Federal Courtswere expanding in importance, volume of cases, and the number of criminal statutes with which they had to deal.

One can point to many factors, such as the civil rights movement, murdering of civil rights workers, or smuggling moonshine during prohibition, but at the foundation, it was the changing of a “village” economy to a global economy through motor vehicles, air travel, radio, TV, and then the internet. Maybe it started with Bonnie and Clyde. In the early 20th century, a bank robber had only to race to the nearest state border and he was safe. Making bank robbery a “Federal Case” brought in the FBI, who could follow them anywhere.

A central, unifying Court like the Federal Court was also ideally suited to bring 50 different jurisdictions into the mainstream on a broad range of issues. Thus, improved racial equality could never have been forced on the old slave states without the heavy arm of the Federal Courts. How does a lone citizen stop a multi-billion dollar corporation from dumping toxic chemicals into the water table? By Making a Federal Case out of it. Unlike in state court, a judgment in Federal Court makes national ripples.

A national and a world economy brings Federal Courts more to center stage, but once a trend is started it is sometimes hard to restrain. Many Federal judges, lawyers and legislators believe that the Federal Government has gone overboard in passing so many criminal and civil laws, that the Federal Courts are overburdened, with the Feds poking into areas that have only very marginal national impact.

If a woman is injured when her Ford Pinto’s gas tank explodes on impact due to faulty design, she could simply sue Ford and win her damages. Or, she could sue in Federal Court, get the case certified as a class action, thus bringing hundreds of thousands of people into the action, and have the judgment control Ford auto design and marketing on a nationwide basis. That is “making a Federal Case” out of a single auto accident. Whether this is good or bad depends on your point of view, your politics, and ultimately upon the budget and resources of the Federal Courts.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption