Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 20, 2013

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Yes, the defendant may appeal after she or he is convicted at trial. Convicted defendants often do appeal their convictions.

If the defendant is acquitted (found “not guilty”) at trial a prosecutor can not appeal. A retrial would constitute “double jeopardy” which is not permitted under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. However, before trial (or during the trial in extra-ordinary circumstances), a prosecutor generally can appeal certain matters, such as a ruling that would “suppress” or refuse to allow evidence to be presented at trial.

For example, if there were video-tapes of O. J. Simpson murdering Nicole Brown Simpson that the judge refused to allow the jury to see, the prosecutor possibly could have sought to appeal the judge’s ruling denying use of the evidence right then and there. But after the acquittal the prosecutor could not have appealed and asked for a new trial on the grounds that the tapes were improperly excluded from the trial.

Similarly, if immediately after the jury’s acquittal of Simpson the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office first discovered such video-tapes, the prosecutor could not have sought a retrial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. On the other hand, if the jury found Simpson guilty in the criminal case you can bet there would have been an appeal.