Lawsuits Based on a Job Reference with False Information

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Jul 16, 2021

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

The situation you describe may give you a cause of action for defamation. Defamation is the public making or provision of a false statement of fact which damages a person’s reputation in the eyes of his or her community and/or causes others to not associate with him or her—and not “associating” with a person includes not hiring or working with him or her.

The two key elements to defamation are: 

Public: this doesn’t mean mass media or put out there for the whole world; even making the statement to one other person can be publically making it, so a bad employment reference can easily meet this particular criteria.

False statement of fact: If it’s not a false statement of fact, it’s not actionable. The “false” part of this requirement is fairly straightforward—either the statement is true or not. If it is true, its truth can raised as defense to a charge or claim of defamation. So if something is true, it does not matter how negative it is.

However, it’s often less clear when something is a statement of fact (potentially defamation) or an opinion (not defamation). For example, take the statement, “Jane Doe is the worst employee I ever had.” That sounds like it’s a factual statement, but it’s actually not; it’s an opinion. It’s an opinion because whether or not Jane Doe is a bad employee or indeed the worst one ever is subjective. One manager might think this, another might disagree, and both statements are equally right or valid.

So getting back to the situation you describe: the first question to ask yourself is, was the statement made truly a fact or could it be considered a statement of opinion? If the latter, then it would almost certainly not be something you could sue over. The second question, assuming that you believe it’s a factual statement, is whether they might be able to prove you did the thing you are accused of? The standard of proof in this context is not “beyond a reasonable doubt,” but rather a showing that it’s more likely than not that you did the thing. If you believe they could do that—especially if motivated by a lawsuit—then they would have a good defense.

If the answer to both questions is “no,” and the statement was negative, was made to a third party, and caused you some loss or damage, you may have a cause of action; you should consult with an attorney.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption