Judge Rules New York’s Sugary Drink Ban “Arbitrary and Capricious”
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Mar 12, 2013
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Manhattan state Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling struck down a New York law that was set to go into effect today, spearheaded by Mayor Bloomberg, prohibiting sugary drinks sold in containers above 16 ounces. Citing research that indicated 58% of New York adults are obese, Bloomberg pushed this plan as one way to combat obesity.
The law would have applied to venues serving food, such as restaurants, but not to grocery stores. The law was approved by the Board of Health and would have imposed $200 fines for transgressors. Judge Tingling took issue with the Board’s authority in imposing the ban, noting that the separation of powers delegates the making of laws to the city council and not the executive branch. He also pointed to the many loopholes in the law that rendered it ineffective for its stated purpose, such as the no-limit on refills, the targeting of some sugary drinks but not others that are even more sugary, and the ban’s applicability to restaurants but not grocery stores. The inherent self-contradicting provisions of the law rendered it “arbitrary and capricious,” according to the judge.
Mayor Bloomberg said yesterday that he plans to appeal.
Find full coverage of the story at Bloomberg.com.