Indiana Auto Accident Lawsuits: Expert Advice

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Jul 15, 2021

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Indiana auto accident cases use a legal theory called comparative fault. While there are different variations of comparative fault, Indiana uses a variation that allows an injured person to collect damages as long as they are not over 50% at fault. Determining this can be a challenge’ especially if you don’t have an experienced attorney on your side.

Answers from Attorney Marc S. Sedwick

Marc S. Sedwick, an experienced personal injury attorney licensed in Indiana and Kentucky who also worked in the insurance industry for many years, sat down with us to explain some of the finer points of how auto accident cases are handled in the state and provided the following answers to our questions:

What is comparative fault?

Comparative fault means that fault is apportioned to the plaintiff, defendant and possibly an entity called a ‘non-party” a person or entity that the plaintiff did not sue but could have apportioned fault to it, such as an employer or a party that the plaintiff’s attorney has voluntarily chosen not to sue based on strategy reasons. A jury will be asked to apportion fault among the plaintiff, defendant and the ‘non-party’ (if any) once all the parties are known. As long as the plaintiff’s fault is at or below 50%, the plaintiff recovers that specific percentage of their damages.

What are the requirements for a victim of an auto accident to sue in Indiana?

There are no minimum requirements for a victim of an auto accident to sue for damages.

What limitations do auto accident victims face in Indiana?

Except for punitive damages, which are limited to the lesser of $50,000 or three times the jury’s award of compensatory damages, there are no recovery imitations in seeking damages for personal injuries due to an automobile collision. However, all bodily injury damages, except for pain and suffering, must be supported by medical expert testimony.

When should you contact an attorney?

While you do not always need to contact an attorney after an accident, often times you should. Insurance companies have experienced claim professionals working on their side and often times, you should also engage the services of an experienced legal professional to represent your interests.

If you’ve been in an auto accident and click here to speak with an experienced Indiana auto accident attorney whose practice focuses in this area of the law.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption