What to do if 9 years ago a dentist drilled significant indentation into existing bridge causing a food trap?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What to do if 9 years ago a dentist drilled significant indentation into existing bridge causing a food trap?
A recent dental exam showed photographs of the actual drilling extent – recent extended pain/infection episode prompted dental visit. Does demand letter to former dentist to pay for new bridge have reasonable chance for success? Am not seeking damages for pain and suffering at this time. New dentist had no idea why the former dentist thought it was a good idea to drill into into an existing bridge.
Asked on July 22, 2013 under Malpractice Law, South Carolina
Answers:
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 10 years ago | Contributor
Potentially, IF it would have been malpractice (or neglient; that is, unreasonably careless) to drill into the existing bridge, the dentist who did it might be liable for the cost to correct the situation and for any extended pain, etc. you suffered. If the out-of-pocket (not paid by your insurance) cost to you is $3,000 or more, its probably worthwhile to retain an attorney and let the attorney seek compensation. For less than that, you may wish to try the demand letter; if the dentist does not pay something, you can then decide if you are willing to try suing in small claims court, acting as your own lawyer (pro se)--though be aware, you'd need expert dental testimony (e.g. from the new dentist) to prove your case, which could cost more than you hope to recover.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.