If the seller of a home cannot close on the agreed-upon date, is this breach of contract and what recourse does the buyer have?
Failing to close on the agreed-upon date would be a breach of contract, assuming that the closing date was one of the contractual terms. Sometimes a breach of contract with closing a home justifies terminating the contract. Call the toll free number above to consult with an attorney about what recourse you have if a seller cannot close on the agreed-upon date or if you otherwise have a breach of contract when buying a home.
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Dec 19, 2020
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.
Failing to close on the agreed-upon date would be a breach of contract (assuming that the closing date was one of the contractual terms). However, not all contractual breaches are created equal.
For any breach, the non-breaching party is generally entitled to compensation (“damages“) for any losses or costs it incurred as a result of the breach. However, only quantifiable monetary damages, or damages reducible to a monetary amount, can be compensated. For example, say that as a result of a late closing, home buyers who already sold their own home had to stay in a hotel for a week while storing their belongings. They could seek compensation for the hotel and storage charges, but won’t be compensated for the “disappointment” of not getting into their new home on time.
Other breaches may excuse certain breaches of the seller, or a court, if the matter had to go to court because the parties could not work it out themselves, might “reform” (or modify) the contract to reflect the fact that one breach (the seller’s failure to close on time) caused the buyer to have problems and need some additional time or accommodation. For example, say that the seller couldn’t close on time, so the buyer lost his mortgage. (Mortgage commitments are usually only good for a certain amount of time.) In that case, the buyer would not be in breach of the contract for not having financing, since the buyer’s breach was caused by seller’s. A court might order the contract to be extended, to give the buyer more time to obtain financing.
Sometimes a breach justifies terminating the contract, if the other party wanted to, as when sellers fail to close, don’t set any new or acceptable date for closing, and the buyer needs to terminate the contract and find a new place to live.
There is no single answer as to what happens if the seller can’t close on time. The buyer’s recourse will depend on the consequences of the failure to close, though since that failure would be a breach of contract, the buyer would be entitled to something.