What is a seller’s obligation to notify a buyer of possible hazards on adjacent land?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What is a seller’s obligation to notify a buyer of possible hazards on adjacent land?
I’m in the process of buying 20 acres of land. I found out that the property next to me was an old land-fill. What are the federal/state legal obligation of seller/realtor to notify me before closing of possible hazards?
Asked on March 24, 2011 under Real Estate Law, Louisiana
Answers:
M.D., Member, California and New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
In a majority of jurisdictions, a seller of real property has an affirmative obligation to make certain disclosures to the buyer concerning the on-site condition of the property being sold. However, somewhat more ambiguous, is the issue regarding the scope of the seller’s obligation to disclose off-site conditions affecting the property. Examples of such conditions include: noisy neighbors, a nearby highway, an adjacent wastewater treatment plant, construction of an apartment complex in the area, a neighbor’s plans to build a tennis court, and a toxic waste contamination problem on a neighboring property (somewhat similar to your situation).
States have taken different approaches to this issue. Some jurisdictions use the same test as they would if the defect were on the property itself. Other jurisdictions have formulated specific rules applicable to off-site conditions. While others appear to limit the disclosure duty to on-site defects only (i.e. there is no duty to disclose off-site conditions). And some states’ disclosure statutes contain broad catch-all provisions that could be interpreted as including off-site conditions. LA's real property form requires disclosure of “other adverse materials or conditions".
However even when there is an affirmative duty to disclose imposed, sellers are not automatically liable for non-disclosure. Typically, a seller may be liable only if they make a material misrepresentation of fact which they know/believe to be false, they intend the buyer to rely on this misrepresentation, the buyer does rely on it, and the buyer suffers damages result. If such a case exists, then a buyer may in fact sue the seller. Additionally, misrepresentation further includes the failure to disclose certain conditions (for example conditions that are not readily observable). Real estate brokers have similar responsibilities concerning disclosure issues. Also, realtors may also be subject to violations under consumer laws for knowingly concealment a material fact about the property.
At this point you need to speak directly to a real estate attorney in your area who can further advise you as to the specifics of LA state disclosure law and liabilities.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.