How is California class action law related to federal class action law?

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Aug 28, 2020

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

In most important respects, California courts follow the same class action procedures as Federal courts. But one major aspect of judicial power varies, even though many of the conclusions of the law remain the same: California courts, rather than statutes, decide whether an “ascertainable class” of plaintiffs exists.

What does this mean?

This means California courts may be more flexible than a federal court in determining the existence of a class.

Where can I find the rules comparing both?

California courts can be said to be fundamentally consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. But the language of California Code of Civil Procedure § 382 never uses the actual words “class action” regarding the class action determinations of California courts.

If these are the areas of basic overlap, what are the differences?

There are several significant differences.

1) California public policy favors class actions, as demonstrated by Sav-On Drug Stores v. Superior Court (2004).

2) California courts avoid major rulings before deciding certification, as demonstrated by Fireside Bank v. Superior Court (2007).

3) California courts view certification of the class as a procedural issue, rather than a decision about the merits of the case.

4) California courts reject a mandatory ‘opt in’ provision by potential class members, which benefits formal class actions.

5) California has a “death knell” provision, allowing an immediate appeal of a denial of certification.

6) California allows flexible, non-court ordered depositions.

7) California courts allow restraining orders even before certification of a class.

8) Federal courts are more protective of potential individual claimants by a liberal tolling of a statute of limitations for all potential class members once the suit is filed.

9) California courts may order either the plaintiff or even the defendant to pay for notice costs. 

10) In California, even a losing case may not protect the defendants from paying plaintiff’s attorney fees in California.

Overall, California’s public policy of protecting class actions makes their state courts more receptive to these claims.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption