Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Jan 28, 2009

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Congress enacted the Inspector General Act of 1978 (the “IG Act”) to combat fraud, abuse, and waste in the “programs and operations” of federal departments and agencies (see 5 U.S.C. app. 3).

Congress passed the IG Act after hearing evidence that fraud and waste had reached epidemic proportions within the Federal Government. Congress’s solution to the problem was the creation of Offices of Inspector General within executive agencies.

There currently exists fifty-eight such Offices of Inspector General. Although the IG Act does not define the terms “programs” and “operations,” the terms have been interpreted to authorize the audit and investigation of (1) federal fund recipients, such as contractors and grantees, to determine if they are complying with federal laws and regulations; and (2) the policies and actions of federal employees. See Authority of the Inspector General to Conduct Regulatory Investigations, 13 Op. Off. Leg. Counsel 63, 79 (March 9, 1989).

Congress has equipped the Offices of Inspector General with incredibly broad powers while requiring that they be independent from the federal agencies that they are obligated to oversee. In this regard, the Offices of Inspector General possess broad subpoena power in conducting its investigations. The courts are willing to enforce a subpoena issued by an Office of Inspector General upon a showing far less than the “probable cause” showing needed in search warrant situations. Consequently, the various Offices of Inspector General are well-equipped to uncover fraudulent activity on the part of those who contract with the Government.

In addition to uncovering defective pricing-type of violations, the Offices of Inspector General may uncover information that results in civil liability or criminal liability or both under the false claims or false statements statutes.