Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 20, 2013

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

In the military justice system the major player is called the convening authority. The convening authority is a unit or organization commander who decides whether to refer a case to a court martial, decides what type of court martial, and then appoints the members of the court (i.e., the jury).

The convening authority is rarely a lawyer, although they are required to obtain the advice of a lawyer (the staff judge advocate) in certain cases, such as whether to convene a general court-martial. UCMJ Art. 34, 10 U.S.C. 834.

The convening authority has many of the powers conferred upon a district attorney in the civilian world, and some powers that a district attorney does not have – such as picking the jury. A convening authority will normally pick mature and responsible officers for a court-martial, which usually means officers with long service and command experience.

All courts martial start out with officer members, and ordinarily all members will be senior to the accused. An enlisted person has the right to request enlisted members, in which case the panel must have be at least 1/3 enlisted. UCMJ Art. 25(c), 10 U.S.C. 825(c). As with the officer members, the convening authority will usually pick enlisted members with long service and leadership experience. It is not unusual to have the court composed of senior officers and senior enlisted personnel.

An enlisted person has the opportunity to examine (voir dire) the members to see if they had any prejudices, knowledge of the case, etc. They could challenge the members for cause, and have one preemptory challenge they could use to exclude a member for any reason. A general court martial must have a least 5 members, and if the number was reduced to below 5 due to challenges, the convening authority would appoint replacement members.

A military verdict usually requires a 2/3 majority. If a jury only has 5 members, 4 members have to agree to convict; so if there is a convictions, at least one enlisted member voted to convict. Both the number of enlisted members and the number of votes required to convict are rounded up to whole persons: 1/3 of 5 equals 2; and 2/3 of 5 equals 4. (Note: A unanimous verdict is required in death penalty cases, and a majority vote for life imprisonment or confinement for more than 10 years. UCMJ Art. 52, 10 U.S.C. 852.)