ERISA, Pension Funds & 401(k) s: Eight Years After Enron

Get Legal Help Today

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by Jeffrey Johnson
Insurance Lawyer Jeffrey Johnson

UPDATED: Aug 5, 2019

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Millions of Americans lost money in the stock market in 2008 – and what happens in 2009 is still anyone’s guess. In today’s volatile market, the last thing people need to worry about is a company mismanaging their pensions and 401(k) plans. However, even though it’s been eight years since the Enron debacle, companies still mismanage retirement funds.

Was Enron a “typical” case of mismanagement?

We asked Ron Dean, a California attorney who has been practicing ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) law for over 35 years, whether Enron a “typical” case of a company mismanaging funds. Here’s what he told us in a recent interview:

We have to remember that a fiduciary is not always the “company.” In the Enron case, the company was engaged in financial shenanigans to boost its stock price to artificially high levels. The fiduciaries of the pension plan, who were also corporate officers, knew about the shenanigans and yet they continued to hold, and even buy more, Enron stock in order to help keep the price up. When the house of cards crashed, so did the pension plans.

We see a lot of these “employer stock” cases, big and small, where the employer’s stock is not a good investment for a pension plan (usually because it’s too risky or doesn’t produce a properly diversified portfolio), yet the employer, acting as a fiduciary, mismanages the fund by putting the interests of the company ahead of the interests of the plan participants.

Post Enron protections; Did they really help?

While many people think that a great deal has been done to protect employees in the post Enron environment, the truth is that those protections only go so far. Dean explained, “Well, there were a whole slew of new laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley law, to try to regulate these kinds of things. [Passed in 2002, Sarbanes-Oxley established new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms so that situations like Enron wouldn’t be repeated.] They helped some, but didn’t get to the core problem. If someone with financial problems (or excess greed) has access to someone else’s money (such as pension plans), it’s only a question of time…”

Scandals not just limited to big business

Dean says that small businesses are greater sources of abuse because there are more of them, corporate owners are more likely to think of the pension money as their own and there are fewer checks and balances with a small employer.

If you’ve been denied valid benefits under ERISA, consult with an experienced ERISA attorney to discuss your situation and evaluate your options. Consultations are free, without obligation and strictly confidential.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

secured lock Secured with SHA-256 Encryption