Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Feb 26, 2020

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

Attorney’s fees can be impacted and have an impact on a structured settlement in a couple of different ways, and they could actually lead to a conflict between attorney and client if not planned for in advance. Many times when you hire an attorney to handle your personal injury case, you sign a fee agreement which provides that your attorney be paid a contingency fee upon conclusion of the case, whether it settles or goes to trial. This is typically 20%-40% of the settlement amount or jury award. There is often no mention of a structured settlement possibility in the initial agreement.

The attorney and client have to work it out and sometimes sign a subsequent agreement just prior to settling. One way the fee can be paid with a structured settlement is up front, i.e., taken out of the settlement dollars, and then the structure is purchased with the balance. The down side for the client is that this could wind up taking quite a chunk out of the annuity. For example, if the offer to settle is $50,000, and the attorney’s fee is $20,000 (40%), then the annuity will only be purchased with the remaining $30,000, which will have much less substantial earnings over the life of the annuity. This, of course, allows the attorney to be paid quickly, but he must then pay income tax on all of that income at once.

Another way the fee may be paid is the attorney can agree to structure the fee over time and be paid from the proceeds as payments are made to the plaintiff or on a separate schedule worked into the structure. This seems to be done more and more these days with large settlements. Legal fees may be structured as installment payments or deferred lump sum payments, and deferral may extend until the attorney’s retirement or other event.

The tax ramifications for attorneys who choose to do this are complicated and attorneys should seek advice from a tax professional prior to agreeing to this type of fee arrangement. The one benefit for the attorney who accepts a structured fee is that he may be able to defer paying taxes on some of the income until he actually receives it. A disadvantage for the attorney is the same possible disadvantage for the client who agrees to a structure, and that is, if the third party insurance company paying the annuity is not government insured and becomes insolvent, the attorney may have to forego the balance of his unpaid fees.

 

 

(Reviewed 9-08)