Court: LinkedIn Connection Requests Don’t Violate "Non-Solicit" Clause

Get Legal Help Today

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption

Jeffrey Johnson is a legal writer with a focus on personal injury. He has worked on personal injury and sovereign immunity litigation in addition to experience in family, estate, and criminal law. He earned a J.D. from the University of Baltimore and has worked in legal offices and non-profits in Maryland, Texas, and North Carolina. He has also earned an MFA in screenwriting from Chapman Univer...

Full Bio →

Written by

UPDATED: Oct 28, 2017

Advertiser Disclosure

It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.

We strive to help you make confident insurance and legal decisions. Finding trusted and reliable insurance quotes and legal advice should be easy. This doesn’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own.

Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about legal topics and insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything legal and insurance related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by experts.

LinkedInMany employment agreements (and other agreements) include a non-solicitation clause.

In the employment context, this type of clause usually says that, for a period of years after leaving the company, the former employee will not “solicit” people and companies like other employers, contractors, clients, prospective clients, and vendors.

The point of such clauses is to protect the company against unfair competition from a former employee using inside information to “steal” business.

Non-solicit clauses are commonly enforced by the courts, because (unlike non-compete clauses), they don’t prevent former employees from earning a living.

What Does It Mean to “Solicit”?

As I wrote about previously, a Minnesota court found that posts on LinkedIn can violate a non-solicit clause in an employment agreement.

In the Minnesota case, a former employee went to work for a competing company and made posts like the following one on her LinkedIn page:

Call me today for a storage container quote from the cleanest, newest, safest and best container fleet in the State of Minnesota.

However, an Illinois appellate court recently found that LinkedIn activity did NOT constitute solicitation in breach of an employment agreement.

Banker’s Life

The case of Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. American Senior Benefits involved a Banker’s Life branch sales manager who signed a non-solicitation agreement that covered the company’s employees:

During the term of this Contract and for 24 months thereafter, within the territory regularly serviced by the Manager’s branch sales office, the Manager shall not, personally or through the efforts of others, induce or attempt to induce: (a) any agent, branch sales manager, field vice president, employee, consultant, or other similar representative of the Company to curtail, resign, or sever a relationship with the company; …

After leaving the company and going to work for a competing company, the manager sent LinkedIn requests to connect to three company employees.

Once they accepted these invitation, the employees clicked on the manager’s LinkedIn profile and saw that his new company had open positions.

Breach of Contract

Banker’s Life sued for breach of contract.

The manager sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that asking to connect wasn’t a “solicitation” within the meaning of the contract.

He pointed out that his emails were simply generic LinkedIn connection requests, with no mention of the available positions.

The trial court agreed with the manager, and the company appealed.

The appeals court noted that a few other courts had considered whether the use of LinkedIn was a solicitation.

For example, in a Connecticut case, a webpage designer updated his LinkedIn account to reflect a new job when he joined a competitor. He also made a LinkedIn post encouraging his connections to “check out” a website he designed for his new company.

When the former employer sued, the court found there was no evidence that any customers of the former employer had ever visited the designer’s LinkedIn account or did any business with his new company as a result.

However, in other cases certain uses of LinkedIn were found to violate a non-solicit.

Generic Invitations

In the Banker’s case, the court found that the generic invitation to connect weren’t solicitations prohibited by the contract.

As these cases show, former employees need to be careful about how they use social media when they go to work for a competitor, but not all uses of social media will violate a non-solicit clause.

Get Legal Help Today

Find the right lawyer for your legal issue.

 Secured with SHA-256 Encryption