Employee Vacation Payout
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Employee Vacation Payout
I have a question with regards to payment of benefits to employees. There was a mistake made under a previous HR manager who overcalculated an employee’s vacation hours vacation hours accrue at 3.08 per pay period up to 80 hours and can roll-over to the following year. Based on this calculation, an employee of ours took 32 hours of paid vacation which we paid out, because he thought that if he didn’t take it then he would lose it due to the 80 hour cap on vacation roll-over. After he took the vacation and the company paid for it, the mistake in the calculations was discovered that he didn’t actually have the extra 32 hours over his 80 hour maximum. Now, the employee is saying that he would not have taken the vacation had he been correctly informed about his hours, and thus, he deserves those vacation hours back. He has also decided to leave the company, and, since we pay out vacation hours, he wants those vacation hours that he would have had had he been correctly informed of the situation as part of his termination payout. Under state labor law, given the prior mistake in the vacation calculations, must we pay him out this amount?
Asked on January 6, 2017 under Employment Labor Law, Nebraska
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 4 years ago | Contributor
No, you don't need to pay him out for those hours, because the law does not let someone "double dip," or be paid twice for the same thing. He took the hours and was already paid for them--he was paid his wage or salary while not working. He cannot be paid them a second time. Whether or not he now wishes he had not used those hours before is irrelevant: he did use them, and was paid.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.