What constitutes commingling of funds?
Get Legal Help Today
Compare Quotes From Top Companies and Save
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
What constitutes commingling of funds?
I have a residential care facility for the elderly. One of my elderly residents pays his monthly rental/services via check payable to me and not the business name (his preference) because it is easier for him. I cash the rental check (and I always write rental/month on the memo line of the check) at his bank since I take him to his bank often at his request. We do not have a joint account nor share the same bank. Is it considered commingling? He’s no longer at my facility and has filed a complaint that I commingled his account.
Asked on May 3, 2011 under Business Law, California
Answers:
M.T.G., Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 13 years ago | Contributor
You would have to read the statute as to commingling of funds in California, but generally speaking, if funds that are earmarked for one thing (the residential care facility here) are deposited and show up somewhere else (your personal bank account and noted on your statement), then technically they are being commingled and you could be charged as such. You would have to show that the deposit and the check written to the residential care facility were contemporaneous, otherwise you could be guilty of much more than commingling under criminal statutes. The word "embezzlement" comes to mind here. I would consult with a criminal attorney in your area on the matter. Good luck.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.