Do I have a case?
Get Legal Help Today
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
Do I have a case?
I was sent to a podiatrist for Archilles tendon pain 1 1/2 years ago. This podiatrist diagnosed me with Archhilles Tendonitis. He treated me for over a year and I was not getting better. I asked my insurance to let me see another podiatrist. After taking X-rays first podiatrist did not take X-rays I was diagnosed with a fractured heel bone spur. The only treatment available is surgery.
Asked on October 18, 2019 under Malpractice Law, California
SJZ, Member, New York Bar / FreeAdvice Contributing Attorney
Answered 2 years ago | Contributor
We can't say whether you do or don't; all we can say is that you might have a case, and if you do, it might be worth bringing.
There are three compenents to a viable malpractice case: negligence; causation; and damages.
Negligence--it's not enough that the doctor was wrong; the law accepts that medicine and doctors are not perfect and sometimes mistakes are made or suboptimal treatment proscribed or situations misdiagosed. The issue is, was the doctor "negligent" or unreasonably careless at the time the diagonsis was made? That depends on whether a reasonable doctor in his or her circumstances, at that time, based on the symptoms you reported, would have diagnosed tendonitis without X-rays or whether a reasonable doctor, based on what you told them and their examination, either would have immediately realized it was a factured heel spur or else ordered X-rays to see what was going on in inside. If a reasonable doctor would have done what this doctor did, there is no negligence or malpractice; there only is if a reasonable doctor would have done something different. What is reasonable or not can only be determined by othe doctors, not laypersons. So do you have any other podaitrists saying that it was careless (negligent) for this doctor to not order X-rays or to diagnose the condition as tendenitis? If you do, you may well have a case; but if other doctors do not feel this one did anything wrong, you would not.
Caustion: even if the diagnosis was negligent, you have have to prove it injured or harmed you or your life, and can only recover for the extent the misdiagnosis hurt you. The misdiagnosis did not cause the bone spur to fracture (so you can't recover compenation for having the facture), but it did cause you to suffer a year-plus of pain and possibly disability by delaying your treatment: you may be able to recover some compensation for that. And if it made the fracture worse by delaying treatment, so that you need more expensive or elaborate surgery or will have a worse outcome, you may be able to recover compensation for the extra costs or worse outcome. You have to be able to identify what the misdiagosis caused you, and can only seek compensation for that.
Damages: related to the above, what is the case worth? If you are getting the same surgery now that you would have then, with the same outcome, then all you'd be able to sue for is the year or year-and-half of pain, etc. and that is not likely enough to justify a lawsuit. (To bring a malpractice case, you need to hire one or more doctors to examine youl, write reports, and testify, and that can cost several thousand dollars.) On the other hand, if due to the delay in treatment, you now need expensive surgery or will likely suffer some amount of permanent pain or disability, that would result in much more compensation and a much more worthwhile case.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although AttorneyPages.com has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.